aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/test/behavior/basic_llvm.zig
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2022-01-26organize behavior testsAndrew Kelley
Every test that is moved in this commit has been checked to see if it is now passing.
2022-01-24stage2: type system treats fn ptr and body separatelyAndrew Kelley
This commit updates stage2 to enforce the property that the syntax `fn()void` is a function *body* not a *pointer*. To get a pointer, the syntax `*const fn()void` is required. ZIR puts function alignment into the func instruction rather than the decl because this way it makes it into function types. LLVM backend respects function alignments. Struct and Union have methods `fieldSrcLoc` to help look up source locations of their fields. These trigger full loading, tokenization, and parsing of source files, so should only be called once it is confirmed that an error message needs to be printed. There are some nice new error hints for explaining why a type is required to be comptime, particularly for structs that contain function body types. `Type.requiresComptime` is now moved into Sema because it can fail and might need to trigger field type resolution. Comptime pointer loading takes into account types that do not have a well-defined memory layout and does not try to compute a byte offset for them. `fn()void` syntax no longer secretly makes a pointer. You get a function body type, which requires comptime. However a pointer to a function body can be runtime known (obviously). Compile errors that report "expected pointer, found ..." are factored out into convenience functions `checkPtrOperand` and `checkPtrType` and have a note about function pointers. Implemented `Value.hash` for functions, enum literals, and undefined values. stage1 is not updated to this (yet?), so some workarounds and disabled tests are needed to keep everything working. Should we update stage1 to these new type semantics? Yes probably because I don't want to add too much conditional compilation logic in the std lib for the different backends.
2021-10-28C backend: implement trunc for unsigned non-pow2 intsAndrew Kelley
2021-10-28C backend: implement trunc instructionAndrew Kelley
Note that there is not any test coverage yet for integer truncation involving non-power-of-two integers.