diff options
| author | Alex Rønne Petersen <alex@alexrp.com> | 2025-04-10 19:17:29 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Alex Rønne Petersen <alex@alexrp.com> | 2025-04-11 17:12:31 +0200 |
| commit | 1f896c1bf89aa0e3d2a0dce1f4cf6ba6ce5ae9ed (patch) | |
| tree | 66d5586f636c37b65a1b99de3c0665bab97ec3f0 /lib/c/string.zig | |
| parent | ee0ff134e9f82bf87751a5174c27b191c04e16c0 (diff) | |
| download | zig-1f896c1bf89aa0e3d2a0dce1f4cf6ba6ce5ae9ed.tar.gz zig-1f896c1bf89aa0e3d2a0dce1f4cf6ba6ce5ae9ed.zip | |
Introduce libzigc for libc function implementations in Zig.
This lays the groundwork for #2879. This library will be built and linked when a
static libc is going to be linked into the compilation. Currently, that means
musl, wasi-libc, and MinGW-w64. As a demonstration, this commit removes the musl
C code for a few string functions and implements them in libzigc. This means
that those libzigc functions are now load-bearing for musl and wasi-libc.
Note that if a function has an implementation in compiler-rt already, libzigc
should not implement it. Instead, as we recently did for memcpy/memmove, we
should delete the libc copy and rely on the compiler-rt implementation.
I repurposed the existing "universal libc" code to do this. That code hadn't
seen development beyond basic string functions in years, and was only usable-ish
on freestanding. I think that if we want to seriously pursue the idea of Zig
providing a freestanding libc, we should do so only after defining clear goals
(and non-goals) for it. See also #22240 for a similar case.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/c/string.zig')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/c/string.zig | 45 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/c/string.zig b/lib/c/string.zig new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0633f7e654 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/c/string.zig @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +const builtin = @import("builtin"); +const std = @import("std"); +const common = @import("common.zig"); + +comptime { + @export(&strcmp, .{ .name = "strcmp", .linkage = common.linkage, .visibility = common.visibility }); + @export(&strlen, .{ .name = "strlen", .linkage = common.linkage, .visibility = common.visibility }); + @export(&strncmp, .{ .name = "strncmp", .linkage = common.linkage, .visibility = common.visibility }); +} + +fn strcmp(s1: [*:0]const c_char, s2: [*:0]const c_char) callconv(.c) c_int { + // We need to perform unsigned comparisons. + return switch (std.mem.orderZ(u8, @ptrCast(s1), @ptrCast(s2))) { + .lt => -1, + .eq => 0, + .gt => 1, + }; +} + +fn strncmp(s1: [*:0]const c_char, s2: [*:0]const c_char, n: usize) callconv(.c) c_int { + if (n == 0) return 0; + + var l: [*:0]const u8 = @ptrCast(s1); + var r: [*:0]const u8 = @ptrCast(s2); + var i = n - 1; + + while (l[0] != 0 and r[0] != 0 and i != 0 and l[0] == r[0]) { + l += 1; + r += 1; + i -= 1; + } + + return @as(c_int, l[0]) - @as(c_int, r[0]); +} + +test strncmp { + try std.testing.expect(strncmp(@ptrCast("a"), @ptrCast("b"), 1) < 0); + try std.testing.expect(strncmp(@ptrCast("a"), @ptrCast("c"), 1) < 0); + try std.testing.expect(strncmp(@ptrCast("b"), @ptrCast("a"), 1) > 0); + try std.testing.expect(strncmp(@ptrCast("\xff"), @ptrCast("\x02"), 1) > 0); +} + +fn strlen(s: [*:0]const c_char) callconv(.c) usize { + return std.mem.len(s); +} |
