aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/SOURCES/simpledrm-nvidia.patch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'SOURCES/simpledrm-nvidia.patch')
-rw-r--r--SOURCES/simpledrm-nvidia.patch87
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 87 deletions
diff --git a/SOURCES/simpledrm-nvidia.patch b/SOURCES/simpledrm-nvidia.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 48be3c8..0000000
--- a/SOURCES/simpledrm-nvidia.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,87 +0,0 @@
-From 205bec68a0ea67b6bff6fea9603b7b8aeacc9d46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
-From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
-Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 14:40:07 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drivers/firmware: skip simpledrm if nvidia-drm.modeset=1
- is set
-
-The Nvidia proprietary driver has some bugs that leads to issues if used
-with the simpledrm driver. The most noticeable is that does not register
-an emulated fbdev device.
-
-It just relies on a fbdev to be registered by another driver, that could
-be that could be attached to the framebuffer console. On UEFI machines,
-this is the efifb driver.
-
-This means that disabling the efifb driver will cause virtual consoles to
-not be present in the system when using the Nvidia driver. Legacy BIOS is
-not affected just because fbcon is not used there, but instead vgacon.
-
-Unless a VGA mode is specified using the vga= kernel command line option,
-in that case the vesafb driver is used instead and its fbdev attached to
-the fbcon.
-
-This is a problem because with CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB=y, the sysfb platform
-code attempts to register a "simple-framebuffer" platform device (that is
-matched against simpledrm) and only registers either an "efi-framebuffer"
-or "vesa-framebuffer" if this fails to be registered due the video modes
-not being compatible.
-
-The Nvidia driver relying on another driver to register the fbdev is quite
-fragile, since it can't really assume those will stick around. For example
-there are patches posted to remove the EFI and VESA platform devices once
-a real DRM or fbdev driver probes.
-
-But in any case, moving to a simpledrm + emulated fbdev only breaks this
-assumption and causes users to not have VT if the Nvidia driver is used.
-
-So to prevent this, let's add a workaround and make the sysfb to skip the
-"simple-framebuffer" registration when nvidia-drm.modeset=1 option is set.
-
-This is quite horrible, but honestly I can't think of any other approach.
-
-For this to work, the CONFIG_FB_EFI and CONFIG_FB_VESA config options must
-be enabled besides CONFIG_DRM_SIMPLEDRM.
-
-Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
----
- drivers/firmware/sysfb.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
-
-diff --git a/drivers/firmware/sysfb.c b/drivers/firmware/sysfb.c
-index 2bfbb05f7d89..a504f7234f35 100644
---- a/drivers/firmware/sysfb.c
-+++ b/drivers/firmware/sysfb.c
-@@ -34,6 +34,22 @@
- #include <linux/screen_info.h>
- #include <linux/sysfb.h>
-
-+static int skip_simpledrm;
-+
-+static int __init simpledrm_disable(char *opt)
-+{
-+ if (!opt)
-+ return -EINVAL;
-+
-+ get_option(&opt, &skip_simpledrm);
-+
-+ if (skip_simpledrm)
-+ pr_info("The simpledrm driver will not be probed\n");
-+
-+ return 0;
-+}
-+early_param("nvidia-drm.modeset", simpledrm_disable);
-+
- static __init int sysfb_init(void)
- {
- struct screen_info *si = &screen_info;
-@@ -45,7 +61,7 @@ static __init int sysfb_init(void)
-
- /* try to create a simple-framebuffer device */
- compatible = sysfb_parse_mode(si, &mode);
-- if (compatible) {
-+ if (compatible && !skip_simpledrm) {
- ret = sysfb_create_simplefb(si, &mode);
- if (!ret)
- return 0;
---
-GitLab